Reference Decision: cc • No. 17-24.312 • 2018-12-06 • View the decision →
Imagine: you are the owner of a building plot in Mimizan, by the lake, and you receive a letter from the municipality informing you that part of your land will be expropriated for the construction of an access road. You are compensated for the lost area, but what about the rest of your land? If it becomes less usable, less buildable, less attractive, can you obtain additional compensation? This is the question raised by this decision of the Court of Cassation of 6 December 2018. And the answer is yes, under certain conditions.
This decision concerns the expropriation procedure for reasons of public utility (when the State or a local authority forces you to sell your property for a project of general interest). It clarifies a crucial point: the loss due to depreciation of the surplus (the loss in value of the remaining part of your land) is compensable as soon as the land is building land. But attention, the judges also recalled that procedural deadlines are not an obstacle if the summary memorandum is filed after the expiry of the legal deadline, provided it takes account of the evolution of the dispute. Analysis.
The Facts: A Story Like Many Others
Mr X, owner in Mimizan, owns a building plot of 5,000 m². The municipality decides to expropriate a plot of 1,000 m² to create an access road to a future housing development. The expropriation is ordered, and compensation is fixed for the expropriated area. But Mr X contests: according to him, the remaining part of his land (4,000 m²) has lost value because it becomes landlocked, with more difficult access and an irregular shape that makes construction less easy. He claims compensation for what is called 'depreciation of the surplus'.
The dispute comes before the Court of Appeal of Bordeaux. Mr X files a summary memorandum containing additional elements, including a judicial expert report, to prove that his land has lost 20% of its value. The municipality objects that this memorandum was filed after the two-month deadline provided for by Article R. 13-49 of the Expropriation Code (the deadline for exchanging memoranda after the filing of the expert report). The Court of Appeal rejects this argument and examines the merits. It awards Mr X compensation of €15,000 for depreciation of the surplus, considering that the principle of this loss is established since the land is building land. The municipality appeals to the Court of Cassation.
The twist: the municipality invokes a procedural defect (the late memorandum) to try to annul the compensation. But the Court of Cassation, in its judgment of 6 December 2018 (No. 17-24.312), dismisses the appeal. It considers that the Court of Appeal, which took account of the evolution of the dispute, did not have to check whether the memorandum had been filed within the deadline. In short, as long as the memorandum provides useful elements for the resolution of the dispute, the exceeding of the deadline is not fatal.
The Reasoning of the Court — Explained
The central question was twofold: on the one hand, is the principle of compensation for depreciation of the surplus established when the land is building land? On the other hand, can non-compliance with the deadline of Article R. 13-49 of the Expropriation Code (two months after the filing of the expert report to file a memorandum) be sanctioned if the memorandum is useful?
On the first point, the Court of Cassation confirms that the principle of a loss due to depreciation of the surplus is already certain since the land is building land. This statement is strong: it means that the owner does not have to prove the existence of a loss; it is sufficient that the land is building land and that it suffers a decrease in value due to the partial expropriation. The amount of compensation remains to be assessed, but the right to compensation is automatically recognised. The Court relies on Article L. 13-13 of the Expropriation Code (now L. 321-1 of the Expropriation Code for Reasons of Public Utility) which provides that compensation must cover the entirety of the direct, material and certain loss.
On the second point, the Court recalls that Article R. 13-49 sets a deadline for filing memoranda after the expert report, but that this deadline is not prescribed on pain of nullity (i.e., non-compliance does not automatically lead to rejection of the memorandum). The Court of Appeal may, taking account of the evolution of the dispute, admit a late memorandum if it provides useful additional elements. In other words, procedure is not an obstacle to judicial truth.
This reasoning confirms a trend of the courts to favour compensation for expropriated owners, while relaxing procedural rules so as not to deprive parties of their rights. However, note: this does not mean that all late memoranda will be accepted; the memorandum must be justified by new elements (such as an expert report) and the judge must consider that it is in the interest of good justice to examine it.
What This Changes for You — Practically
If you are the owner of a building plot partially expropriated, this decision is good news. You can now claim compensation for depreciation of the surplus without having to prove that the loss exists; it is enough that your land is building land. Practically, if your land loses area, configuration, access, or becomes less well oriented, you are entitled to additional compensation.
Take an example in Tarnos: you own a building plot of 2,000 m², of which 500 m² are expropriated for a bypass road project. The remaining part (1,500 m²) becomes L-shaped, with reduced access. An expert estimates the decrease in value at 15%. If the initial value was €100/m², your loss is 1,500 m² × €100 × 15% = €22,500. Before this decision, the municipality could challenge the very principle of compensation by arguing that the land remained buildable. Now, the principle is established: compensation is due to you, even if you can still build on the remaining part.
For tenants, this decision has no direct impact, as expropriation concerns the owner. However, if you are a tenant of land or premises on an expropriated plot, you may be entitled to an eviction indemnity (for loss of your right of use). For buyers, be vigilant: if you buy land that has been partially expropriated, check that the compensation for depreciation of the surplus has been paid to the former owner, as this affects the value of the property.
If you are in this situation, you must act quickly: the deadline to contest the expropriation compensation is generally two months after notification of the expropriation order. Consult a lawyer lawyer to assess your loss and file a memorandum in time, even if this decision relaxes the procedural rules.
Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute
- Have an independent expert report carried out as soon as the expropriation project is notified. Do not rely on the administration's estimate. A judicial or friendly expert can assess the decrease in value of your surplus and build solid evidence.
- Do not accept the first offer without reservation. The municipality or State tends to underestimate the depreciation of the surplus. Formulate a reasoned counter-proposal, with examples of comparable sales in your area (e.g., in Mimizan or Tarnos).
- Respect procedural deadlines as much as possible, but do not give up if you exceed them. As this decision shows, a late memorandum may be accepted if it brings new elements. However, it is better not to take the risk: file your submissions within two months of the expert report.
- Consult a lawyer specialising in expropriation law from the start. undefined, I have seen cases where owners have lost thousands of euros due to failing to properly quantify their loss. A lawyer will help you build a complete file and negotiate with the expropriating authority.
Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.
Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments
This decision is part of a line of case law favourable to owners. Already, in a judgment of 21 February 2006 (No. 04-17.283), the Court of Cassation had ruled that depreciation of the surplus must be compensated, even if the land remained buildable, as long as the decrease in value was established. The novelty of 2018 is to consider that the principle of loss is automatically established due to buildability, which lightens the burden of proof for the owner.
In contrast, an earlier decision of 2012 (No. 11-19.202) seemed more restrictive, requiring the owner to demonstrate a specific loss in value. The 2018 judgment therefore clarifies the position of the Court: the mere fact that the land is building land is enough to presume a loss, even if it may be minimal. This goes in the direction of better protection of property rights, in accordance with Article 17 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (which guarantees the right to just and prior compensation in case of expropriation).
For the future, one can expect that the courts will be more demanding on the assessment of the amount of compensation, but more flexible on the principle. Municipalities will therefore have to budget larger sums for partial expropriations of building land. In Mimizan, for example, where building land is scarce and expensive, this could increase the cost of development projects.
Key Points to Remember
FAQ:
- Can I obtain compensation for the loss in value of my remaining land after a partial expropriation? Yes, if your land is building land, the principle of compensation is established. You must have the decrease in value assessed by an expert.
- What if I have missed the deadline to file my memorandum? Do not be discouraged. If you have new elements (expert report, etc.), you can still present them to the judge, who may admit them if they are useful for resolving the dispute.
- What is the typical amount of compensation? It depends on the loss in value, generally between 10% and 30% of the value of the surplus. For example, for land worth €100,000, compensation can range from €10,000 to €30,000.
- Do I have to take a lawyer? It is not mandatory, but strongly recommended. The expropriation procedure is technical, and a lawyer lawyer will maximise your chances of obtaining fair compensation.
- Does this decision apply to non-building land? No, the judgment emphasises buildability. For agricultural or natural land, the loss due to depreciation of the surplus must be proved specifically.
Checklist: What to Do If You Are Partially Expropriated
- Check whether your land is building land (local town planning plan).
- Have an independent expert report carried out on the value before and after expropriation.
- Do not accept the first compensation offer.
- Consult a lawyer lawyer within two months of notification of the expropriation order.
- File a summary memorandum within the deadlines, or at the latest before the closure of the investigation.
Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →