Toutes nos analyses de jurisprudence en droit immobilier et foncier : décisions commentées, cas pratiques et conseils d'expert
3010 articles trouvés
Tout comprendre sur la VEFA : du contrat préliminaire à la livraison, en passant par les garanties financières, le retard de livraison, les vices et les recours en cas de litige. Guide pratique par Maître Cécile Zakine, avocate en droit immobilier.
Juridiction:
Guide complet sur le CCMI (Contrat de Construction de Maison Individuelle) par un avocat spécialisé. Litiges, retard, malfaçons, garanties, conseils pratiques.
Juridiction:
Peut-on fermer une servitude de passage ? Guide complet avec la jurisprudence récente de la Cour de cassation. Solutions amiables et judiciaires par un avocat spécialisé.
Juridiction:
A noise police check in Reims annulled on a technicality? The Court of Cassation reminds that only nullities provided for by law count. Analysis for landlords and tenants.
Juridiction: cc
Date: 02/03/1999
The Court of Cassation reminds that the railway carrier is under an absolute liability towards the passenger. The victim's fault can only partially exonerate the carrier, and only if it has the characteristics of force majeure, which excludes total exoneration in most cases.
Juridiction: cc
Date: 13/03/2008
The Constitutional Council validates the suspension of a broadcasting licence by the CSA even if the decision does not expressly mention disruption of the public service, provided that the prior formal notice was properly served. Explanations for audiovisual professionals and frequency owners.
Juridiction: cc
Date: 24/03/1992
In 1981, the Cour de cassation quashed a judgment that held SNCF liable for an accident at an unguarded level crossing. It ruled that the presence of a car immobilised on the track was an unforeseeable event for the train driver, who could not be held liable if he had applied the brakes and sounded the warning signal.
Juridiction: cc
Date: 25/11/1981
The Court of Cassation reminds that when a judgment only decides a dispute over the duration of exposure to risk, the social security fund may raise other objections to the claim for coverage. A key decision for employees and employers facing a dispute over the recognition of an occupational disease.
Juridiction: cc
Date: 06/02/1985
A 1988 decision of the Constitutional Council specifies that if a television company can lift the requisition of its personnel on the very day of a strike, the employee who has already complied with that requisition may legitimately remain at his post. This analysis explains the facts, the judges' reasoning and the implications for employees and employers.
Juridiction: cc
Date: 07/01/1988
This 1972 decision of the French Supreme Court clarifies the liability of a driver who did not hear the siren of an ambulance, even if the siren was sounding loudly. It reminds us that inattention can be a fault, but its unforeseeability for the priority driver may mitigate his liability. Useful for any driver faced with an emergency vehicle.
Juridiction: cc
Date: 03/11/1972
The Court of Cassation ruled in 1974 that a pedestrian walking at night on a road, dressed in dark clothing, without an armband or lamp, does not commit a fault in the absence of a regulatory requirement. This decision, still relevant today, reminds us that road safety is based on legal obligations, not mere recommendations.
Juridiction: cc
Date: 27/06/1974
The French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) reminds that an emergency vehicle on duty benefits from priority without needing to prove the exact nature of its mission. A ruling that directly impacts motorists in Perpignan and Canet-en-Roussillon.
Juridiction: cc
Date: 20/07/1993
Les analyses de ce magazine sont à titre informatif. Pour un conseil personnalisé :
Consultation 45€ - 30 minutes