Foncier

Construction Without Planning Permission: Regularisation Does Not Erase the Offence (Cass. crim. 1974)

📅 Décision du 03 December 1974⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 1 vues📖 6 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation reminds that obtaining planning permission after the fact does not make the offence constituted at the time of construction disappear. A look back at a 1974 ruling that is still relevant today.

Reference Decision: cc • No. 73-93.054 • 1974-12-03 • View the decision →

You have just purchased a beautiful villa in Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, with stunning views of the Mediterranean. The previous works? A shed at the back of the plot, built three years ago. The seller assures you: 'I regularised it, I have the planning permission.' Are you safe? Not so sure. The question that every owner who inherits a dubious construction asks themselves: can they really sleep soundly once a regularisation permit has been issued?

This decision of the Court of Cassation from 1974 answers in the negative. It reminds us of a fundamental rule: the offence of construction without planning permission (a criminal offence) is constituted on the day of construction, and a permit obtained afterwards does not erase it. For owners in Beausoleil or elsewhere, this is a clear warning.

But then, what is the point of a regularisation permit? And what are the risks if you are in this situation? Let's delve into the facts and the judges' reasoning.

The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day

Imagine Mr. X, a contractor from Roquebrune-Cap-Martin. In 1971, without waiting for the precious document, he built a shed to store his trucks. He knew that planning permission was required, but time was pressing. A few months later, on 16 May 1972, he obtained planning permission... for regularisation. Relieved, he thought the matter was closed.

Alas! The administration did not intend to let what it considered an offence pass. Mr. X was prosecuted before the criminal court for construction without planning permission. At first instance, he was convicted. He appealed, arguing that the regularisation permit had 'cured' the situation. The Court of Appeal upheld the conviction. In its view, the offence was constituted on the day the structures were erected, without authorisation.

Mr. X appealed to the Court of Cassation. His argument? 'You cannot say that I built without permission and at the same time note that I obtained one. That is contradictory.' The Court of Cassation did not see it that way: no, there is no contradiction. The offence is instantaneous; the subsequent permit does not erase it.

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The judges rely on Article L. 421-1 of the French Planning Code (in its then-current version), which penalises the act of erecting a building without having first obtained planning permission. The offence is constituted as soon as the works are carried out without authorisation. It does not matter if regularisation subsequently occurs: the offence exists, it is completed.

Mr. X's defence invoked a contradiction in the grounds of the appeal judgment: 'You admit that I have a permit, but you convict me for not having had one.' The Court of Cassation dismissed the argument: the regularisation permit is an administrative act that authorises the construction retrospectively, but it does not have the effect of erasing the criminal fault committed. This is a confirmation of previous case law, which clearly distinguishes administrative regularisation from a criminal offence.

In other words, planning criminal law punishes conduct at the time of the facts. It is not a right that can be 'cured' by a late authorisation. The judges thus remind that urban planning public policy must be respected from the outset.

What This Means for You — Practically

If you are an owner in Beausoleil and have inherited a construction without planning permission, even if regularised, you may be criminally prosecuted. The consequences? A fine of up to €120,000 (under Article L. 480-4 of the Planning Code), and even an order to demolish or restore the premises. For example, a 100 m² shed built without planning permission in Beausoleil, even regularised in 2022, could result in a fine of €10,000 if the administration decides to prosecute.

For a tenant, be vigilant: if you rent a property with an unauthorised extension, you could be involved in a dispute between the owner and the town hall. As a buyer, demand a certificate of non-prosecution or a planning certificate.

If you are in this situation, you should consult a specialist solicitor to assess the risks. The limitation period for criminal proceedings is 6 years (the general rule), but it runs from the discovery of the offence. Better to act quickly.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Before building, check whether planning permission is required: For any creation of floor space or ground area exceeding 20 m², a permit is necessary. Enquire at your local town hall's planning department.
  • Never start work before obtaining planning permission: Even if the application process is long, wait for the decision. Acting prematurely is risky and may be held against you.
  • In case of regularisation, do not believe everything is settled: A regularisation permit avoids administrative demolition, but not criminal prosecution. Consult a solicitor to understand your situation.
  • If you buy a property with recent constructions, demand the permits: Ask the seller for planning permissions. If in doubt, carry out a planning search at the town hall.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This solution has been confirmed subsequently. For example, in a judgment of 20 February 1991 (No. 90-82.976), the Court of Cassation held that the grant of a regularisation permit does not bar criminal proceedings. The trend is consistent: judges protect urban planning public policy.

On the other hand, a notable development: since the ALUR law of 2014, town halls may issue regularisation permits with an increased development tax. This encourages regularisation but does not erase the offence. In the future, courts are expected to become increasingly strict, especially with undeclared constructions in high-demand areas like the Côte d'Azur.

What You Absolutely Must Remember

FAQ

Can I be prosecuted for a construction without planning permission if I have regularised it?
Yes, the regularisation permit does not erase the criminal offence. You may be fined.

What should I do if I have inherited a construction without planning permission?
Consult a solicitor to assess the risks. You can attempt regularisation, but it does not protect you from prosecution.

What is the limitation period for this offence?
6 years from the discovery of the offence. Note that the construction may be discovered at any time.

Can I sell a property with an unauthorised construction?
Yes, but you must inform the buyer. If it is a latent defect, you could be sued.

What is the maximum fine for construction without planning permission?
Up to €120,000, with the possibility of demolition.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →



📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.

→ Avocat servitudes & foncier  | 
→ Browse all our legal articles


Questions fréquentes

Puis-je être poursuivi pour construction sans permis si j'ai obtenu un permis de régularisation ?

Oui, selon la Cour de cassation (arrêt du 3 décembre 1974), le permis de régularisation n'efface pas l'infraction pénale constituée au moment de l'édification. Vous risquez une amende, voire une démolition.

Que faire si j'ai hérité d'une construction sans permis ?

Consultez un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'urbanisme. Vous pouvez tenter une régularisation administrative, mais sachez qu'elle ne vous met pas à l'abri de poursuites pénales. Mieux vaut anticiper.

Quel est le délai de prescription pour une construction sans permis ?

L'action publique se prescrit par 6 ans à compter de la découverte de l'infraction. La construction peut être découverte à l'occasion d'un contrôle, d'une vente ou d'une plainte.

Puis-je vendre un bien avec une construction non autorisée ?

Oui, mais vous devez informer l'acheteur par écrit. En cas de vice caché, vous pourriez être poursuivi pour dol. Il est conseillé de régulariser avant la vente.

Quelle est l'amende maximale pour construction sans permis ?

Jusqu'à 120 000 € (article L. 480-4 du Code de l'urbanisme). Le tribunal peut aussi ordonner la démolition ou la mise en conformité.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 73-93.054
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 03 décembre 1974

Mots-clés

construction sans permispermis de régularisationdélit d'urbanismeCour de cassation 1974urbanisme pénal

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Owner who built a shed without planning permission in Roquebrune-Cap-Martin

Mr. X, owner of a villa in Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, built an 80 m² shed in 2021 without planning permission. In 2023, he obtains a regularisation permit. Yet the town hall prosecutes him criminally.

Application pratique:

This case law applies: Mr. X may be fined (up to €120,000). He must negotiate with the prosecutor to avoid demolition, by proposing a criminal settlement.

2

Buyer of a property with an unauthorised extension in Beausoleil

Mrs. Y buys a house in Beausoleil in 2024. The 30 m² extension was built without planning permission by the previous owner, who claims to have regularised it. In reality, the regularisation permit is fraudulent.

Application pratique:

Mrs. Y may be affected if the offence is discovered. She must demand from the seller a warranty against eviction or a price reduction. She may also bring an action for latent defects.

3

Tenant of a commercial premises with unauthorised works

Mr. Z rents a commercial premises in Nice. The landlord carried out partitioning works without planning permission. Mr. Z risks administrative closure.

Application pratique:

Mr. Z must inform the landlord by registered letter. He may request a rent reduction or terminate the lease. He must keep evidence to protect himself.

CZ

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit, spécialisée en droit immobilier et foncier. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par Maître Zakine.

Voir le cabinet →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45