Aller au contenu principal
Within the meaning of Article L
Droit Immobilier

Within the meaning of Article L

📅 Decision of 28 February 2018🔄 Updated on 13 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 18 views📖 2 min read

Within the meaning of Article L. 341-4, now Articles L. 332-1 and L. 343-4 of the Consumer Code, the manifest disproportion of the suretyship to the surety's assets and income on the day it was entered into presupposes that the surety was at that date manifestly unable to meet such a commitment with his or her assets and income. Consequently, a court of appeal which merely notes that the surety's commitment was practically equal to the amount of his or her estate and that his or her monthly income was burdened by the repayment of loans is based on grounds that are inappropriate to characterise such a disproportion.

Reference decision: cc • No. 16-24.841 • 2018-02-28 • Consult the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your real estate law rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Within the meaning of Article L. 341-4, now Articles L. 332-1 and L. 343-4 of the Consumer Code, the manifest disproportion of the suretyship to the surety's assets and income on the day it was entered into presupposes that the surety was at that date manifestly unable to meet such a commitment with his or her assets and income. Consequently, a court of appeal which merely notes that the surety's commitment was practically equal to the amount of his or her estate and that his or her monthly income was burdened by the repayment of loans is based on grounds that are inappropriate to characterise such a disproportion.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Scrupulously comply with the statutory time limits for bringing proceedings
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, letters)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 16-24.841
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 28 February 2018

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide