Aller au contenu principal
No sum of money is due, to
Droit Immobilier

No sum of money is due, to

📅 Decision of 15 May 2001🔄 Updated on 6 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 28 views📖 2 min read

No sum of money is due, in any capacity whatsoever, to the estate agent before the transaction for which he has received a written mandate has been effectively concluded and recorded in a single instrument containing the undertaking of the parties. When this undertaking contains a forfeiture clause or a condition precedent, the transaction cannot be regarded as effectively concluded, for the purposes of the third paragraph of Article 6 of the Law of 2 January 1970, in the event of forfeiture or as long as the right of forfeiture subsists or as long as the condition precedent is not fulfilled.

Reference decision: cc • No. 95-17.098 • 2001-05-15 • Consult the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

No sum of money is due, in any capacity whatsoever, to the estate agent before the transaction for which he has received a written mandate has been effectively concluded and recorded in a single instrument containing the undertaking of the parties. When this undertaking contains a forfeiture clause or a condition precedent, the transaction cannot be regarded as effectively concluded, for the purposes of the third paragraph of Article 6 of the Law of 2 January 1970, in the event of forfeiture or as long as the right of forfeiture subsists or as long as the condition precedent is not fulfilled.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, letters)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 95-17.098
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 15 May 2001

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide