Aller au contenu principal
No right to remain in the rented premises
Droit Immobilier

No right to remain in the rented premises

📅 Decision of 01 September 2026🔄 Updated on 13 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 views📖 2 min read

At the expiry of the lease, the occupier of land whose essential purpose is sporting, by reason of the tennis courts located on it and the ancillary nature of the caretaker's lodge situated in a corner of the land, has no right to remain in the rented premises, since the letting in question does not primarily concern residential premises or premises used for professional purposes.

Reference decision: cc • No. 75-11.430 • 1976-06-16 • View decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

At the expiry of the lease, the occupier of land whose essential purpose is sporting, by reason of the tennis courts located on it and the ancillary nature of the caretaker's lodge situated in a corner of the land, has no right to remain in the rented premises, since the letting in question does not primarily concern residential premises or premises used for professional purposes.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Strictly comply with statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 75-11.430
  • Court: Cour de cassation

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide