Aller au contenu principal
It is up to the owner of a
Droit Foncier

It is up to the owner of a

📅 Decision of 07 November 1984🔄 Updated on 13 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 17 views📖 2 min read

It is up to the owner of a landlocked plot to prove that he has used, for less than thirty years, the route of the right of way he claims over a neighbouring plot. Consequently, a judgment is subject to cassation where, after having found that the owner of a landlocked plot had previously acquired by prescription the claimed route, it holds that the owner of the servient land does not prove that the use of this route of the passage remained unused for more than thirty years by the owner of the landlocked plot.

Reference decision: cc • No. 83-14.257 • 1984-11-07 • Consult the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

It is up to the owner of a landlocked plot to prove that he has used, for less than thirty years, the route of the right of way he claims over a neighbouring plot. Consequently, a judgment is subject to cassation where, after having found that the owner of a landlocked plot had previously acquired by prescription the claimed route, it holds that the owner of the servient land does not prove that the use of this route of the passage remained unused for more than thirty years by the owner of the landlocked plot.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation servitudes  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 83-14.257
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 07 November 1984

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide