Aller au contenu principal
The clause which makes the acquisition conditional
Droit Immobilier

The clause which makes the acquisition conditional

📅 Decision of 22 November 2018🔄 Updated on 4 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 views📖 2 min read

A clause which makes entitlement to the warranty conditional upon the carrying out of a technical study does not constitute an exclusion of warranty. The Court of Appeal, which, after having found that the construction of a retaining wall had been planned and entrusted by the client to a contractor under a contract separate from the individual house construction contract, orders the individual house builder to repair the damage resulting from the building of that wall, fails to draw the legal consequences of its own findings.

Reference decision: cc • No. 17-22.112 • 2018-11-22 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A clause which makes entitlement to the warranty conditional upon the carrying out of a technical study does not constitute an exclusion of warranty. The Court of Appeal, which, after having found that the construction of a retaining wall had been planned and entrusted by the client to a contractor under a contract separate from the individual house construction contract, orders the individual house builder to repair the damage resulting from the building of that wall, fails to draw the legal consequences of its own findings.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing an action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 17-22.112
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 22 November 2018

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide