Aller au contenu principal
Failure to comply with formalities
Droit Immobilier

Failure to comply with formalities

📅 Decision of 14 February 2012🔄 Updated on 12 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 21 views📖 2 min read

Failure to comply with the substantive formalities to which police custody is subject may be invoked in support of an application for annulment of an act or procedural document only by the party concerned. The Investigating Chamber gives reasons for its decision when, in order to declare inadmissible the application for annulment, made by one charged person, of the police custody of another charged person, it holds that the rights of the person in police custody recognised by Article 6 § 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights are rights personal to that person.

Reference decision: cc • No. 11-87.757 • 2012-02-14 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it means for you.

The situation

Failure to comply with the substantive formalities to which police custody is subject may be invoked in support of an application for annulment of an act or procedural document only by the party concerned. The Investigating Chamber gives reasons for its decision when, in order to declare inadmissible the application for annulment, made by one charged person, of the police custody of another charged person, it holds that the rights of the person in police custody recognised by Article 6 § 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights are rights personal to that person.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal deadlines for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 11-87.757
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 14 February 2012

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide