Aller au contenu principal
The absence of grounds for a notice of termination with
Droit Immobilier

The absence of grounds for a notice of termination with

📅 Decision of 19 February 2014🔄 Updated on 6 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 35 views📖 2 min read

The absence of grounds for a notice of termination with refusal to renew without offer of an eviction indemnity leaves the notice of termination subsisting and the tenant's right to claim payment of an eviction indemnity. Thus, the Court of Appeal that annuls an unmotivated notice of termination and, noting that the lease has continued, dismisses the tenant's claim for payment of an eviction indemnity, violates Articles L. 145-9, L. 145-14 and L. 145-17 of the Commercial Code.

Decision reference: Court of Cassation • No. 11-28.806 • 2014-02-19 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The absence of grounds for a notice of termination with refusal to renew without offer of an eviction indemnity leaves the notice of termination subsisting and the tenant's right to claim payment of an eviction indemnity. Thus, the Court of Appeal that annuls an unmotivated notice of termination and, noting that the lease has continued, dismisses the tenant's claim for payment of an eviction indemnity, violates Articles L. 145-9, L. 145-14 and L. 145-17 of the Commercial Code.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Scrupulously respect the statutory time limits for appeals.
  • Keep all supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence).
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 11-28.806
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 19 February 2014

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide