Aller au contenu principal
Action to set aside a judgment
Droit Immobilier

Action to set aside a judgment

📅 Decision of 04 June 2020🔄 Updated on 15 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 33 views📖 2 min read

As regards an action to set aside a judgment of adjudication handed down following an immovable property seizure procedure, which does not seek the annulment of a contract, the Court of Appeal correctly held that Article 1304 of the Civil Code, in its version prior to Ordinance No. 2016-131 reforming the law of obligations, still in force in French Polynesia, is not applicable to this action and that it is subject to the thirty-year limitation period provided for in Article 2262 of the Civil Code, in its version prior to Law No. 2008-561 of 17 June 2008 on limitation periods, still applicable in that territory. In so ruling, the Court of Appeal does not infringe either the principle of legal certainty or the right to respect for property under Article 6, § 1, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the First Additional Protocol thereto.

Reference decision: cc • N° 18-22.930 • 2020-06-04 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

An action to set aside a judgment of adjudication handed down following an immovable property seizure procedure, which does not seek the annulment of a contract: the Court of Appeal correctly held that Article 1304 of the Civil Code, in its version prior to Ordinance No. 2016-131 reforming the law of obligations, still in force in French Polynesia, is not applicable to this action and that it is subject to the thirty-year limitation period provided for in Article 2262 of the Civil Code, in its version prior to Law No. 2008-561 of 17 June 2008 on limitation periods, still applicable in that territory. In so ruling, the Court of Appeal does not infringe either the principle of legal certainty or the right to respect for property under Article 6, § 1, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the First Additional Protocol thereto.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 18-22.930
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 04 June 2020

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide