Aller au contenu principal
Appeal of a judgment ordering an investigative measure
Droit Immobilier

Appeal of a judgment ordering an investigative measure

📅 Decision of 26 January 1994🔄 Updated on 14 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 17 views📖 2 min read

An appeal against a judgment ordering an investigative measure without deciding any part of the main claim, lodged at the same time as the appeal against the judgment on the merits, is only admissible if that appeal is itself admissible. Therefore, a court of appeal cannot infer from the indeterminate nature of the claim on which the interlocutory judgment ruled the admissibility of the appeal against that judgment together with the judgment on the merits when, the claims having been amended, the sums claimed are below the jurisdictional threshold.

Reference decision : cc • N° 92-15.328 • 1994-01-26 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

An appeal against a judgment ordering an investigative measure without deciding any part of the main claim, lodged at the same time as the appeal against the judgment on the merits, is only admissible if that appeal is itself admissible. Therefore, a court of appeal cannot infer from the indeterminate nature of the claim on which the interlocutory judgment ruled the admissibility of the appeal against that judgment together with the judgment on the merits when, the claims having been amended, the sums claimed are below the jurisdictional threshold.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 92-15.328
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 26 January 1994

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide