Aller au contenu principal
Appeal brought against the party whose property has been seized by a
Droit Immobilier

Appeal brought against the party whose property has been seized by a

📅 Decision of 11 September 2026🔄 Updated on 18 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 25 views📖 2 min read

An appeal brought against the party whose property has been seized by a higher bidder whose higher bids have been declared null and void is inadmissible where, before the court, the higher bidder has not filed submissions against the party whose property has been seized and no order has been made by the first instance judges against one in favour of the other.

Reference decision: cc • No. 68-13.608 • 1970-01-21 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

An appeal brought against the party whose property has been seized by a higher bidder whose higher bids have been declared null and void is inadmissible where, before the court, the higher bidder has not filed submissions against the party whose property has been seized and no order has been made by the first instance judges against one in favour of the other.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 68-13.608
  • Court: Cour de cassation

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide