Aller au contenu principal
The criminal judge may not impose the
Droit Immobilier

The criminal judge may not impose the

📅 Decision of 24 October 1994🔄 Updated on 17 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 views📖 2 min read

The criminal judge may not impose the proportional penalty provided for in Article 1791 of the General Tax Code, the amount of which is between one and three times the amount of the evaded duties, unless he has sought and determined those duties with accuracy(1). Therefore, the appeal court which sentences a defendant to pay evaded or compromised VAT, while refusing to take into account the amount of duties the person concerned may have already paid elsewhere and the VAT rate actually applicable to the case, is liable to be overturned.

Reference decision: cc • N° 92-84.895 • 1994-10-24 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The criminal judge may not impose the proportional penalty provided for in Article 1791 of the General Tax Code, the amount of which is between one and three times the amount of the evaded duties, unless he has sought and determined those duties with accuracy(1). Therefore, the appeal court which sentences a defendant to pay evaded or compromised VAT, while refusing to take into account the amount of duties the person concerned may have already paid elsewhere and the VAT rate actually applicable to the case, is liable to be overturned.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Scrupulously respect the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, letters)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation for €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 92-84.895
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 24 October 1994

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide