Aller au contenu principal
The right of first refusal entails
Droit Immobilier

The right of first refusal entails

📅 Decision of 06 December 2018🔄 Updated on 7 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 25 views📖 2 min read

The right of first refusal implies an obligation, for the grantor, to give preference to the beneficiary when he decides to sell the property. Therefore, the judgment must be set aside which, in rejecting the claims of the beneficiary of a right of first refusal, holds that only the date of the exchange of consents is to be taken into account and that, since the signed document was a unilateral promise to sell, the sale could only take effect upon the exercise of the option, which occurred after the expiry date of the agreement.

Reference decision: cc • N° 17-23.321 • 2018-12-06 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The right of first refusal implies an obligation, for the grantor, to give preference to the beneficiary when he decides to sell the property. Therefore, the judgment must be set aside which, in rejecting the claims of the beneficiary of a right of first refusal, holds that only the date of the exchange of consents is to be taken into account and that, since the signed document was a unilateral promise to sell, the sale could only take effect upon the exercise of the option, which occurred after the expiry date of the agreement.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly adhere to statutory limitation periods for bringing claims
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30 min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 17-23.321
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 06 December 2018

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide