Aller au contenu principal
The principle set out in article L
Droit Immobilier

The principle set out in article L

📅 Decision of 13 September 2023🔄 Updated on 17 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 19 views📖 2 min read

The principle set out in article L. 622-21, I, of the Commercial Code, of the stay or prohibition of legal actions by creditors whose claim is not mentioned in I of article L. 622-17 of the Commercial Code and which seeks payment of a sum of money or termination of a contract for non-payment of a sum of money, does not preclude an action seeking a declaration of termination of a vehicle lease contract by application of an automatic termination clause that took effect before the judgment opening the judicial reorganisation of the lessee. Thus, a Court of Appeal violates article L. 622-21, I, of the Commercial Code when, in order to declare the lessor's application for a declaration that the termination clause has been acquired inadmissible, it holds that the lessor's action cannot, in the absence of a decision having the force of res judicata, be continued after the judgment opening the judicial reorganisation of the lessee.

Reference decision: cc • No. 22-12.047 • 2023-09-13 • View decision →

This decision provides important insight into your real estate law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The principle set out in article L. 622-21, I, of the Commercial Code, of the stay or prohibition of legal actions by creditors whose claim is not mentioned in I of article L. 622-17 of the Commercial Code and which seeks payment of a sum of money or termination of a contract for non-payment of a sum of money, does not preclude an action seeking a declaration of termination of a vehicle lease contract by application of an automatic termination clause that took effect before the judgment opening the judicial reorganisation of the lessee. Thus, a Court of Appeal violates article L. 622-21, I, of the Commercial Code when, in order to declare the lessor's application for a declaration that the termination clause has been acquired inadmissible, it holds that the lessor's action cannot, in the absence of a decision having the force of res judicata, be continued after the judgment opening the judicial reorganisation of the lessee.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30 min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 22-12.047
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 13 September 2023

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide