Aller au contenu principal
The statutory provisions relating to
Droit Immobilier

The statutory provisions relating to

📅 Decision of 12 February 2003🔄 Updated on 16 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 views📖 2 min read

The statutory provisions relating to contracts for the construction of individual houses on a proposed plan, where the purchaser uses credit, do not impose on the lender the obligation to verify the truthfulness of the documents produced but only their existence, and the lender is not required to demand the originals of the documents set out in Article L. 231-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, which it must obtain production of pursuant to Article L. 231-10 of that Code.

Reference decision: cc • No. 01-12.086 • 2003-02-12 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The statutory provisions relating to contracts for the construction of individual houses on a proposed plan, where the purchaser uses credit, do not impose on the lender the obligation to verify the truthfulness of the documents produced but only their existence, and the lender is not required to demand the originals of the documents set out in Article L. 231-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, which it must obtain production of pursuant to Article L. 231-10 of that Code.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 01-12.086
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 12 February 2003

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide