Aller au contenu principal
The various government measures
Droit Immobilier

The various government measures

📅 Decision of 19 June 2025🔄 Updated on 6 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 views📖 2 min read

The various government measures relating to the fight against the spread of the Covid-19 virus did not impose a ban on hotels receiving the public but empowered the State representative to prohibit or restrict, by regulatory or individual measures, activities that were not prohibited when local circumstances required it. Accordingly, a court of appeal legally justifies its decision when, in order to exclude the business interruption cover for losses suffered by a hotel, provided by an insurance contract in the event of closure of the establishment by administrative decision due to contagious diseases or infections, it states that the prefectoral order prohibiting the letting, for tourist purposes, of hotel rooms located within the territory of several municipalities in order to prevent the spread of the Covid-19 virus did not concern the municipality where the establishment operated by the insured is located.

Reference decision: cc • No. 23-20.325 • 2025-06-19 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The various government measures relating to the fight against the spread of the Covid-19 virus did not impose a ban on hotels receiving the public but empowered the State representative to prohibit or restrict, by regulatory or individual measures, activities that were not prohibited when local circumstances required it. Accordingly, a court of appeal legally justifies its decision when, in order to exclude the business interruption cover for losses suffered by a hotel, provided by an insurance contract in the event of closure of the establishment by administrative decision due to contagious diseases or infections, it states that the prefectoral order prohibiting the letting, for tourist purposes, of hotel rooms located within the territory of several municipalities in order to prevent the spread of the Covid-19 virus did not concern the municipality where the establishment operated by the insured is located.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 23-20.325
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 19 June 2025

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide