Aller au contenu principal
The grounds of the decision by which
Droit Immobilier

The grounds of the decision by which

📅 Decision of 31 October 2018🔄 Updated on 18 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 19 views📖 2 min read

The grounds of the decision by which the sentence enforcement chamber rejects an application for conditional release, noting in particular the convicted person's dangerousness, his unamenability to treatment, the risk of reoffending and the inadequacy of his guarantees of rehabilitation, justify both the rejection of the measure requested and the setting of the time limit provided for in Article 712-13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, during which any application for the same purposes is inadmissible.

Reference decision: cc • No. 17-86.660 • 2018-10-31 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The grounds of the decision by which the sentence enforcement chamber rejects an application for conditional release, noting in particular the convicted person's dangerousness, his unamenability to treatment, the risk of reoffending and the inadequacy of his guarantees of rehabilitation, justify both the rejection of the measure requested and the setting of the time limit provided for in Article 712-13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, during which any application for the same purposes is inadmissible.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for legal remedies
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 17-86.660
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 31 October 2018

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide