Aller au contenu principal
The Pauline non-opposability enacted by
Droit Immobilier

The Pauline non-opposability enacted by

📅 Decision of 09 April 2014🔄 Updated on 17 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 18 views📖 2 min read

The Pauline non-opposability enacted by article 1167 of the Civil Code authorises the pursuing creditor, by court decision and within the limit of his claim, to escape the effects of an alienation made in fraud of his rights, in order to restore his general right of pledge over the subject matter of that alienation, by authorising him to seize it in the hands of the third party. It follows that a court decision declaring the non-opposability of an act of contribution of the bare ownership of company shares to a third-party company cannot have any effect on the pledging or seizure of the usufruct of those securities, which has remained in the debtor's estate, the party who made the fraudulent contribution.

Reference decision: cc • No. 12-23.022 • 2014-04-09 • View the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The Pauline non-opposability enacted by article 1167 of the Civil Code authorises the pursuing creditor, by court decision and within the limit of his claim, to escape the effects of an alienation made in fraud of his rights, in order to restore his general right of pledge over the subject matter of that alienation, by authorising him to seize it in the hands of the third party. It follows that a court decision declaring the non-opposability of an act of contribution of the bare ownership of company shares to a third-party company cannot have any effect on the pledging or seizure of the usufruct of those securities, which has remained in the debtor's estate, the party who made the fraudulent contribution.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 12-23.022
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 09 April 2014

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide