Aller au contenu principal
The offer of an eviction indemnity
Droit Immobilier

The offer of an eviction indemnity

📅 Decision of 09 October 1991🔄 Updated on 14 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 20 views📖 2 min read

The offer of an eviction indemnity does not prevent the landlord from subsequently refusing to renew the commercial lease without indemnity if he establishes that the conditions for the right to renewal are not met. The judgment is therefore legally justified which, having noted that the tenant was not registered in the commercial register for the secondary establishment operated in the leased premises, decides that the tenant was not entitled to renewal of the lease and could not claim payment of an eviction indemnity.

Reference decision: cc • N° 90-12.824 • 1991-10-09 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The offer of an eviction indemnity does not prevent the landlord from subsequently refusing to renew the commercial lease without indemnity if he establishes that the conditions for the right to renewal are not met. The judgment is therefore legally justified which, having noted that the tenant was not registered in the commercial register for the secondary establishment operated in the leased premises, decides that the tenant was not entitled to renewal of the lease and could not claim payment of an eviction indemnity.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 90-12.824
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 09 October 1991

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide