Aller au contenu principal
When an SNCF employee requests
Droit Immobilier

When an SNCF employee requests

📅 Decision of 22 May 1995🔄 Updated on 17 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 views📖 2 min read

When an SNCF employee requests the application of a general law provision that they consider more favourable than the corresponding provision of the regulations drawn up by SNCF, the judicial courts may not decline jurisdiction but must, pursuant to Article L. 511-1, last paragraph, of the Labour Code, rule on the merits of the dispute between them and SNCF.

Reference decision: cc • No. 94-40.775 • 1995-05-22 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

When an SNCF employee requests the application of a general law provision that they consider more favourable than the corresponding provision of the regulations drawn up by SNCF, the judicial courts may not decline jurisdiction but must, pursuant to Article L. 511-1, last paragraph, of the Labour Code, rule on the merits of the dispute between them and SNCF.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory deadlines for appeals.
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence).
  • Think ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 94-40.775
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 22 May 1995

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide