Aller au contenu principal
The opening of a procedure for
Droit Immobilier

The opening of a procedure for

📅 Decision of 03 June 2004🔄 Updated on 11 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 21 views📖 2 min read

The opening of a judicial reorganisation procedure against a defendant does not prevent the imposition of the joint and several liability provided for by Article 1745 of the General Tax Code, a measure of a criminal nature that has no impact on the determination of the taxes owed or on the obligation of the tax authorities to file their claim in the collective proceedings. The judgment of a court of appeal that stayed the proceedings on the claims of the tax authorities, as civil party, seeking the imposition of this measure, and adjourned the case to a later hearing to allow those authorities to prove that they had filed their claim in the liabilities of the defendant's judicial reorganisation or that they had commenced an action to be relieved from the time-bar, must be quashed.

Reference decision: cc • No. 04-82.036 • 2004-06-03 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The opening of a judicial reorganisation procedure against a defendant does not prevent the imposition of the joint and several liability provided for by Article 1745 of the General Tax Code, a measure of a criminal nature that has no impact on the determination of the taxes owed or on the obligation of the tax authorities to file their claim in the collective proceedings. The judgment of a court of appeal that stayed the proceedings on the claims of the tax authorities, as civil party, seeking the imposition of this measure, and adjourned the case to a later hearing to allow those authorities to prove that they had filed their claim in the liabilities of the defendant's judicial reorganisation or that they had commenced an action to be relieved from the time-bar, must be quashed.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 04-82.036
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 03 June 2004

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide