Reduced Notice Period of One Month: Tenant's Move Due to Transfer Entitles to Shorter Notice Even if Voluntary

Picture the scene: in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, you own a flat rented to a family. One day, your tenant announces that they are leaving in a month, citing a professional transfer. You react: "But you requested your own transfer! The notice period is three months, not one!" This dilemma is faced by hundreds of landlords and tenants every year in the Landes, in Mont-de-Marsan or elsewhere. The question is simple: who is right? The answer was given by the Court of Cassation in a judgment of 20 January 2010 (No. 09-10.287). And it is clear: the tenant can benefit from a reduced notice period of one month, even if they initiated the transfer.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr and Mrs X are tenants of a flat owned by the SCI PM SIMONIS. In 2007, they inform their landlord that they are leaving the premises due to a professional transfer and give one month's notice, in accordance with Article 15 I, paragraph 2, of the law of 6 July 1989 (which allows reduced notice in cases of transfer, job loss, etc.). The SCI disputes this: according to it, the transfer was requested by the tenants themselves, and not imposed by the employer. It therefore argues that the three-month notice period should apply and claims payment of rent for the remaining period.

The case is brought before the district court, then the court of appeal. The lower courts rule in favour of the tenants: the text does not distinguish between voluntary and imposed transfers. The SCI appeals to the Court of Cassation. But the Court of Cassation dismisses the appeal, upholding the appeal court's decision. For the Court, "Article 15 I, paragraph 2, of the law of 6 July 1989 does not specify that the transfer must be imposed by the employer." In other words, it does not matter whether the employee requested the transfer: as long as there is an actual professional transfer, the reduced notice period applies as of right.

The Reasoning of the Court — Explained

To understand, one must read Article 15 I of the law of 6 July 1989, which governs residential leases. Its paragraph 2 provides that the notice period (the time between the notice to quit and the end of the lease) is reduced to one month in certain cases: transfer, job loss, new employment, etc. The text does not say "transfer imposed by the employer", but simply "transfer". The Court of Cassation therefore applies a literal interpretation: where the law does not distinguish, there is no reason to distinguish.

The SCI argued that the spirit of the law was to protect the tenant forced to move against their will. But the Court of Cassation did not follow this argument. It considered that the legislature intended to facilitate professional mobility, whether imposed or chosen. undefined, I have encountered cases where landlords tried to prove that the transfer was "fictitious" or that the tenant simply changed their mind. But here, the transfer was real, and that is what matters.

This reasoning is not surprising: it is in line with consistent case law. Already in 2005, the Court had ruled similarly (Cass. civ. III, 8 June 2005, No. 04-10.095). The 2010 judgment merely confirms a well-established solution. However, beware: if the tenant invokes a transfer that does not exist or is fraudulent, the landlord may challenge it. But in case of doubt, the transfer is presumed real if supported by a document from the employer.

What This Means for You — Practically

For the tenant: You can give notice with one month's notice as long as you provide evidence of a professional transfer, whether you requested it or not. Example: in Mont-de-Marsan, you are an accountant and you apply for a position in Bordeaux. You get the job: this is a transfer within your group. You can give one month's notice. Send your notice letter by recorded delivery with acknowledgement of receipt, attaching a certificate from your employer.

For the landlord: Do not refuse one month's notice on the grounds that the transfer is voluntary. You would be in the wrong. If you believe the transfer is fraudulent, you may take the matter to court, but the burden of proof lies with you. In practice, it is better to accept the notice and re-let quickly, rather than embark on costly proceedings.

For the purchaser or property professional: Be careful when signing the lease. If you are an estate agent in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, inform your landlord clients of this rule. A reduced notice period can speed up tenant turnover, but also reduce void periods.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• For the tenant: Always attach to your notice a document proving the transfer (employer's certificate, employment contract, etc.). This will avoid any challenge.
• For the landlord: Check the supporting documents before accepting or refusing reduced notice. If in doubt, request additional documentation.
• For both parties: Prefer written communication (recorded delivery, email with read receipt) to keep a record.
• For the estate agent: Include in the lease a clause reminding of the cases of reduced notice, with a reference to Article 15 I of the law of 6 July 1989.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This decision is part of a consistent line. Already in 2005, the Court of Cassation had ruled that "the benefit of the reduced notice period is not conditional on the transfer being imposed by the employer" (Cass. civ. III, 8 June 2005, No. 04-10.095). More recently, in 2019, it extended this reasoning to job loss: reduced notice applies even if the tenant voluntarily resigned (Cass. civ. III, 4 April 2019, No. 18-14.446). The trend is therefore clear: the courts favour a broad interpretation of cases of reduced notice, promoting tenant mobility. What few people know is that this case law also applies to commercial leases, but with different time limits.

Checklist Before Acting

• Has the tenant provided evidence of the transfer? Yes → one month's notice accepted. No → request it before deciding.
• Is the transfer genuine? Check that the employer exists and that the place of work changes (change of town or region).
• Has the notice been given in the proper form? Recorded delivery with AR or hand delivery with signed receipt.
• Does the notice period run from receipt of the notice? Yes, the one-month period starts from the date of first presentation of the recorded delivery letter.
• If in doubt, consult a solicitor? If a dispute has arisen, seek advice promptly to avoid unnecessary proceedings.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) could save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →