Aller au contenu principal
Deprives its decision of a legal basis with regard to
Droit Immobilier

Deprives its decision of a legal basis with regard to

📅 Decision of 13 March 2008🔄 Updated on 17 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 33 views📖 2 min read

A judgment which dismisses the indivisibility between a telephone equipment lease agreement and a "telephone subscription contract" having as its object the installation of this equipment and its maintenance, without examining whether the clause of the telephone subscription contract providing that when the equipment is made available to the user under a lease agreement entered into with a financing organisation, the fee due shall include the amount of the monthly rentals payable to the lessor and shall be collected in full by the company responsible for maintenance which shall pay over to the lessor the amount of the rentals, was not such as to establish this indivisibility, and despite its findings from which it could be inferred that the rental made no sense without the installation services of the equipment contractually owed to the user, deprives its decision of a legal basis with regard to Article 1218 of the Civil Code.

Reference decision: cc • N° 06-19.339 • 2008-03-13 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A judgment which dismisses the indivisibility between a telephone equipment lease agreement and a "telephone subscription contract" having as its object the installation of this equipment and its maintenance, without examining whether the clause of the telephone subscription contract providing that when the equipment is made available to the user under a lease agreement entered into with a financing organisation, the fee due shall include the amount of the monthly rentals payable to the lessor and shall be collected in full by the company responsible for maintenance which shall pay over to the lessor the amount of the rentals, was not such as to establish this indivisibility, and despite its findings from which it could be inferred that the rental made no sense without the installation services of the equipment contractually owed to the user, deprives its decision of a legal basis with regard to Article 1218 of the Civil Code.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 06-19.339
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 13 March 2008

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide