Aller au contenu principal
According to Article R
Droit Immobilier

According to Article R

📅 Decision of 09 November 2022🔄 Updated on 18 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 81 views📖 2 min read

According to Article R. 223-32 of the French Commercial Code, when a derivative action is brought by a shareholder, the court may only rule if the company has been duly joined through its legal representatives. The court may appoint an ad hoc representative to represent the company in the proceedings where there is a conflict of interest between the company and its legal representatives. It follows that a derivative action brought by a shareholder is admissible only if the company is properly represented in the proceedings. Where there is a conflict of interest between the company and its legal representative, the company can only be properly represented by an ad hoc representative, which the judge must appoint at the request of the shareholder or legal representative or, as the case may be, on his own motion.

Reference decision: cc • N° 20-19.077 • 2022-11-09 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is how it affects you.

The situation

According to Article R. 223-32 of the French Commercial Code, when a derivative action is brought by a shareholder, the court may only rule if the company has been duly joined through its legal representatives. The court may appoint an ad hoc representative to represent the company in the proceedings where there is a conflict of interest between the company and its legal representatives. It follows that a derivative action brought by a shareholder is admissible only if the company is properly represented in the proceedings. Where there is a conflict of interest between the company and its legal representative, the company can only be properly represented by an ad hoc representative, which the judge must appoint at the request of the shareholder or legal representative or, as the case may be, on his own motion.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing an action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30 min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 20-19.077
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 09 November 2022

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide