Aller au contenu principal
A company that manufactures
Droit Immobilier

A company that manufactures

📅 Decision of 17 January 2002🔄 Updated on 18 October 2026⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 32 views📖 2 min read

A company that manufactures frozen products in all seasons with only a periodic increase in production does not have a seasonal activity and must pay to employees hired under fixed-term contracts the precariousness allowance provided for in Article L. 122-3-4 of the Labour Code, which is sufficient to render payable the contributions collected in this respect by URSSAF. Consequently, the judgment which annulled the reassessment carried out by that body on the grounds that the allowance was not due and that only the employees concerned could rely on non-payment must be censured.

Reference decision: cc • N° 00-14.709 • 2002-01-17 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A company that manufactures frozen products in all seasons with only a periodic increase in production does not have a seasonal activity and must pay to employees hired under fixed-term contracts the precariousness allowance provided for in Article L. 122-3-4 of the Labour Code, which is sufficient to render payable the contributions collected in this respect by URSSAF. Consequently, the judgment which annulled the reassessment carried out by that body on the grounds that the allowance was not due and that only the employees concerned could rely on non-payment must be censured.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Legal information

  • Number: 00-14.709
  • Court: Cour de cassation
  • Decision of: 17 January 2002

Keywords

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

About the author

Maître Cécile Zakine — Lawyer at the Alpes-Maritimes Bar, Doctor of Law. Every article in this magazine is based on the analysis of a real court decision, commented and put into perspective by Maître Zakine’s team.

Book an appointment →

Disclaimer: The analysis presented on this site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised legal advice. For advice tailored to your situation, contact a qualified lawyer.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide