Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Having found that the corporate purpose

📅 Décision du 24 October 2012⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 1 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Having found that the corporate purpose of a property investment partnership (SCI) was the acquisition, administration and management by letting or otherwise of all furnished and fitted buildings and real property, and having noted that the transaction had a direct connection with that corporate purpose, the Court of Appeal rightly deduced that, not being a non-professional purchaser, it could not benefit from the provisions of Article L. 271-1 of the Construction and Housing Code.

Reference decision: cc • No. 11-18.774 • 2012-10-24 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Having found that the corporate purpose of a property investment partnership (SCI) was the acquisition, administration and management by letting or otherwise of all furnished and fitted buildings and real property, and having noted that the transaction had a direct connection with that corporate purpose, the Court of Appeal rightly deduced that, not being a non-professional purchaser, it could not benefit from the provisions of Article L. 271-1 of the Construction and Housing Code.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for taking legal action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, legal instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 11-18.774
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 24 octobre 2012

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide