Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Having noted that the Act of 8 June 1999

📅 Décision du 04 January 2006⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 10 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Having noted that the Act of 8 June 1999 makes it mandatory for the sale of a co-ownership unit to provide a parasitic condition report less than three months old on the common parts, a Court of Appeal correctly holds that a managing agent vested by Article 18 of the Act of 10 July 1965 with the power to administer the building and ensure its preservation may, without authorisation from the general meeting, commission such a quarterly report at a low cost enabling immediate action in the event of infestation

Reference decision: cc • N° 04-19.771 • 2006-01-04 • Consult the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Having noted that the Act of 8 June 1999 makes it mandatory for the sale of a co-ownership unit to provide a parasitic condition report less than three months old on the common parts, a Court of Appeal correctly holds that a managing agent vested by Article 18 of the Act of 10 July 1965 with the power to administer the building and ensure its preservation may, without authorisation from the general meeting, commission such a quarterly report at a low cost enabling immediate action in the event of infestation

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly observe the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 04-19.771
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 04 janvier 2006

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Selling a flat in Paris: quick parasitic report

You own a 2-bedroom flat in a co-ownership building in the 15th arrondissement of Paris and have found a buyer. The notaire informs you that a parasitic condition report (état parasitaire) less than 3 months old is mandatory for the sale, costing around €180. You learn the syndic already commissioned one 6 weeks ago for the entire building, which can be used for your unit.

Application pratique:

Thanks to the Cour de cassation ruling of 4 January 2006, your syndic could order this low-cost report without needing a vote from the general meeting. You can request a copy from the syndic at no extra charge, speeding up your sale. Ensure the report is less than 3 months old on the date of the final deed. This proactive approach by the syndic saves you both time and money.

2

First-time buyer in Lyon: outdated termite report

You are purchasing your first home, a studio in a co-ownership residence in Lyon. The diagnostic file includes a termite report dated 4 months ago. You worry it might not meet the legal requirement of being less than 3 months old at the time of signing the sale agreement (compromis de vente).

Application pratique:

Based on the 2006 decision, syndics can order quarterly reports without general meeting approval, making it likely that an updated report is available or can be quickly commissioned. Ask the seller or syndic for the most recent report on common parts. If none exists, the syndic can obtain one at low cost (around €150) within days, ensuring your transaction satisfies the law and giving you peace of mind against hidden infestations.

3

Co-owner in Marseille disputes need for urgent pest inspection

You are a co-owner in a 1960s building in the Panier district of Marseille. You've noticed wood damage in the communal staircase that might be termites. Some neighbours oppose spending money on an inspection, arguing it requires a general meeting vote. The syndic is hesitant.

Application pratique:

The Cour de cassation ruling confirms that the syndic has the power to commission a parasitic condition report on common parts without prior approval, as long as the cost is reasonable (e.g., under €200). This is part of their duty to preserve the building. You can cite this decision to the syndic and your fellow co-owners, enabling immediate action. If infestation is confirmed, prompt treatment can prevent expensive structural repairs, potentially saving each co-owner thousands of euros.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Jurisprudence immobilière

Il résulte des articles 2394 et 2412 du code civil que l'hypothèque n'a lieu que dans les cas et suivant les formes autorisées par la loi et que si celui qui a obtenu un jugement en sa faveur bénéficie d'une hypothèque judiciaire, il n'est pas dispensé de procéder à l'inscription de celle-ci dans les conditions de l'article 2426 du même code. C'est donc à bon droit qu'une cour d'appel a retenu qu'aucun texte ne le prévoyant, la publication d'un commandement valant saisie immobilière n'est pas assimilable à une inscription d'hypothèque sur l'immeuble saisi et que, par conséquent, la créance détenue ne peut être admise qu'à titre chirographaire

11 sept. 2026Lire →

Jurisprudence immobilière : analyse et conseils pratiques

UNE COUR D'APPEL PEUT, EN APPLICATION DE L'ARTICLE 161 DE LA LOI DU 13 JUILLET 1967, PRONONCER LA LIQUIDATION DES BIENS D'UN ASSOCIE DE SOCIETES DE CONSTRUCTION, DES LORS QU'ELLE CONSTATE QUE, FONDATEUR ET DIRIGEANT DE CES SOCIETES, IL A REVENDU AVEC DE SUBSTANTIELS BENEFICES LES PARTS SOCIALES LUI DONNANT DROIT A DES APPARTEMENTS, ET QU'AINSI IL S'EST LIVRE A DES OPERATIONS DE CONSTRUCTION DANS UN BUT LUCRATIF.

11 sept. 2026Lire →

Encourt la cassation l'arrêt qui, pour

Encourt la cassation l'arrêt qui, pour décider qu'un mandant n'est pas lié par la transaction conclue par son mandataire après révocation du mandat, énonce qu'il appartenait au tiers contractant de s'assurer que le mandataire tenait bien du mandant le pouvoir de transiger tout en constatant que ce tiers n'était pas informé de la révocation du mandat.

11 sept. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide