Droit Immobilier

Characterises the existence of a

📅 Décision du 27 October 1981⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Characterises the existence of a "popular movement", within the meaning of Article L 133-1° of the Code des communes and of a clause in an insurance contract covering the insured against resulting damage, the Court of Appeal which finds that the destruction and thefts committed by a group of men in 1975, to the detriment of the insured, were part of the overall plan of an organisation, which had manifested itself on numerous occasions since 1975, by creating disorder and violence. The second-instance court was therefore able to deduce from these findings that the action of which the insured had been a victim did not constitute an "act of sabotage or individual maliciousness", excluded from cover, but resulted from a "popular movement".

Reference decision: cc • N° 80-12.895 • 1981-10-27 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Characterises the existence of a "popular movement", within the meaning of Article L 133-1° of the Code des communes and of a clause in an insurance contract covering the insured against resulting damage, the Court of Appeal which finds that the destruction and thefts committed by a group of men in 1975, to the detriment of the insured, were part of the overall plan of an organisation, which had manifested itself on numerous occasions since 1975, by creating disorder and violence. The second-instance court was therefore able to deduce from these findings that the action of which the insured had been a victim did not constitute an "act of sabotage or individual maliciousness", excluded from cover, but resulted from a "popular movement".

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the legal deadlines for bringing proceedings
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 80-12.895
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 27 octobre 1981

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide