It is rightly so that an appellate court
Droit Immobilier

It is rightly so that an appellate court

📅 Décision du 14 June 1988⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

It is rightly so that an appellate court orders a real estate agent who concluded a sale subject to a condition precedent to return the commission that he received prior to the fulfilment of the condition, regardless of whether the condition was subsequently fulfilled.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation, No. 87-10.797, 14 June 1988 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here’s what it changes for you.

The situation

It is rightly so that an appellate court orders a real estate agent who concluded a sale subject to a condition precedent to return the commission that he received prior to the fulfilment of the condition, regardless of whether the condition was subsequently fulfilled.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly observe the statutory limitation periods for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, notarised acts, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 87-10.797
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 14 juin 1988

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

First-time buyer’s early commission payment on failed mortgage

Sophie, a first-time buyer in Lyon, paid €7,000 in estate agent fees upon signing a compromis de vente for a flat. The sale was subject to a mortgage condition precedent, which was ultimately refused. The agent now refuses to return the commission.

Application pratique:

Under the Court of Cassation ruling, an agent must return any commission received before a condition precedent is fulfilled—even if the condition later fails. Sophie should formally demand a full refund in writing, citing this case. If the agent still refuses, she can initiate small claims proceedings (tribunal judiciaire) to recover the €7,000 plus interest.

2

Seller forced to reclaim early-paid commission during planning delay

Alain sold his house in Bordeaux with a €10,000 agent fee taken upfront at the preliminary contract stage. The sale hinged on the buyer obtaining planning permission for an extension within three months. After four months, the permission is still pending, yet the agent retains the fee.

Application pratique:

This ruling confirms that payment before condition fulfilment is premature—Alain is entitled to reclaim the €10,000 regardless of any eventual permission. He should send a mise en demeure (formal notice) to the agent demanding repayment within 15 days. Should the agent dispute this, Alain can rely on this Cour de Cassation precedent in court to obtain restitution.

3

Investor’s commercial lease transfer condition drags on

Marc, an investor, agreed to buy a Paris commercial property with a €15,000 agent commission debited at signature. The condition precedent (transfer of the existing tenant’s lease) missed its 60‑day deadline and was only completed weeks later. The agent insists the fee was fairly earned.

Application pratique:

Even though the condition was eventually satisfied, the agent’s early receipt of the commission was unlawful from the start. Marc can demand an immediate refund of the €15,000, explaining that payment is only due upon actual fulfilment—and not before. If the agent resists, Marc can seek a court order referencing this binding precedent, which protects both buyers and sellers from premature fee extraction.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45