Droit Immobilier

Judgment Declaring Co-owner's Action Time-Barred Must Be Quashed

📅 Décision du 27 September 2000⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The judgment declaring a co-owner's action relating to the apportionment of special lift charges time-barred must be quashed, since the Court of Appeal had observed that the general meeting's decision apportioning the charges was contrary to the criteria set out in article 10 of the Law of 10 July 1965, and the limitation period under article 42(2) of that Law does not apply to actions concerning clauses deemed unwritten.

Reference decision: cc • No. 98-22.792 • 2000-09-27 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it means for you.

The situation

The judgment declaring a co-owner's action relating to the apportionment of special lift charges time-barred must be quashed, since the Court of Appeal had observed that the general meeting's decision apportioning the charges was contrary to the criteria set out in article 10 of the Law of 10 July 1965, and the limitation period under article 42(2) of that Law does not apply to actions concerning clauses deemed unwritten.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Scrupulously respect the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 98-22.792
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 27 septembre 2000

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Ground-floor owner paying lift charges for years

You own a ground-floor apartment in a six-storey building in Lyon. Since 2015, you have been charged €40 per month for lift maintenance, allocated equally among all co-owners, even though your unit has no access or need for the lift.

Application pratique:

This apportionment ignores utility, contrary to Article 10 of the 1965 law. The 2000 Court of Cassation ruling confirms that such clauses are deemed unwritten, meaning the usual two-month challenge period does not apply. You can demand the owners' association recalculate charges exclusively among the benefiting units, and seek reimbursement of overpayments going back up to five years.

2

Commercial tenant paying unfair lift service charges

You are a landlord leasing a ground-floor shop with a private street entrance in a mixed-use building in Nice. Your tenant's lease passes through lift maintenance charges of €90 per quarter, even though the shop has no access to the residential lift.

Application pratique:

Despite the passage of time, you can challenge the co-ownership resolution that imposed these charges. The decision establishes that any charge allocation contrary to legal criteria is null and void with no limitation period. Write to the syndic requesting immediate correction and credit for past overcharges, which you can then refund to your tenant or adjust in future rent.

3

Buying a flat with suspect charge history

You are considering purchasing a 2nd-floor flat in a 1970s block in Toulouse. The seller's documents show monthly charges of €250, including €65 for the lift, but you notice the ground-floor units also pay the same lift charge—which seems unfair and possibly illegal.

Application pratique:

This case law protects you: if you purchase, you can immediately ask the co-ownership syndic to correct the unlawful charge allocation, because clauses violating Article 10 are deemed unwritten and can be challenged at any time. Before signing, request an extraordinary general meeting to regularise the charges, or negotiate a price reduction to account for the risk of future legal action.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45