Droit Immobilier

The judgment must be quashed which, to

📅 Décision du 16 June 1993⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The judgment must be quashed which, in order to reduce the damages awarded to the client, holds that while the sum fixed by the court is not disputed and is in accordance with the expert's valuation, the contractor nonetheless rightly argues that the client has been unjustly enriched, as the client would necessarily have borne an additional cost if the work had been properly carried out from the outset, while noting that the work had been carried out in such conditions that its demolition and reconstruction were required and that the sum adopted by the first judges corresponded to the cost of rebuilding the wall.

Reference decision: cc • No. 91-21.226 • 1993-06-16 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The judgment must be quashed which, in order to reduce the damages awarded to the client, holds that while the sum fixed by the court is not disputed and is in accordance with the expert's valuation, the contractor nonetheless rightly argues that the client has been unjustly enriched, as the client would necessarily have borne an additional cost if the work had been properly carried out from the outset, while noting that the work had been carried out in such conditions that its demolition and reconstruction were required and that the sum adopted by the first judges corresponded to the cost of rebuilding the wall.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 91-21.226
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 16 juin 1993

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide