Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

In the presence of a clause releasing the

📅 Décision du 03 July 1970⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Where a clause releases the lessor from all liability for competition that might be caused to the lessee by persons established in another commercial premises or in any other neighbouring building, the courts may, by a necessary interpretation of this ambiguous clause, decide that it does not preclude an implied warranty of non-competition for events subsequent to the conclusion of the lease, and hold the lessor liable for the commercial disturbance he caused by subsequently authorising another tenant to carry on a similar business in the building.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 68-13.944 • 1970-07-03 • View decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Where a clause releases the lessor from all liability for competition that might be caused to the lessee by persons established in another commercial premises or in any other neighbouring building, the courts may, by a necessary interpretation of this ambiguous clause, decide that it does not preclude an implied warranty of non-competition for events subsequent to the conclusion of the lease, and hold the lessor liable for the commercial disturbance he caused by subsequently authorising another tenant to carry on a similar business in the building.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Scrupulously comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 68-13.944
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 03 juillet 1970

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide