Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Subject to cassation, the judgment which

📅 Décision du 18 March 2003⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

A judgment is subject to cassation where it dismisses the contractor's claim for indemnity against his insurer for damage caused to third parties, on the grounds that no fault was proved and that cover was excluded for obligations accepted by the insured which were not incumbent upon him under statutory provisions, whereas the contractor, who carried out the works at the origin of the damage, is strictly liable for disturbances exceeding the normal inconveniences of neighbourliness.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 99-18.720 • 2003-03-18 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A judgment is subject to cassation where it dismisses the contractor's claim for indemnity against his insurer for damage caused to third parties, on the grounds that no fault was proved and that cover was excluded for obligations accepted by the insured which were not incumbent upon him under statutory provisions, whereas the contractor, who carried out the works at the origin of the damage, is strictly liable for disturbances exceeding the normal inconveniences of neighbourliness.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing an action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 99-18.720
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 18 mars 2003

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide