Droit Immobilier

A judgment is subject to cassation which, in order to

📅 Décision du 16 November 1983⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 2 min de lecture

A judgment is subject to cassation where, in order to dismiss the limitation defence against an action for the removal of works installed on the common parts of a building within a co-ownership property, it states that the claim was brought less than ten years after the creation of the secondary co-ownership, whereas the co-owners of that building, for the management of which the secondary co-owners' association had been created, were entitled to act prior to its formation.

Reference decision: cc • No. 82-13.530 • 16 November 1983 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A judgment is subject to cassation where, in order to dismiss the limitation defence against an action for the removal of works installed on the common parts of a building within a co-ownership property, it states that the claim was brought less than ten years after the creation of the secondary co-ownership, whereas the co-owners of that building, for the management of which the secondary co-owners' association had been created, were entitled to act prior to its formation.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with statutory time limits for bringing claims
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, documents, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 82-13.530
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 16 novembre 1983

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord seeks removal of illegal terrace extension

Sophie, a landlord in Lyon, owns a flat in a co-ownership. Her tenant recently reported that the adjacent owner extended their terrace onto the common courtyard in 2015, reducing light. A secondary co-owners' association was formed only last year. She wonders if she can still demand removal.

Application pratique:

Per the 1983 Cour de Cassation ruling, the 10-year limitation period for such actions begins from the date of the offending works (2015), not the formation of the secondary association. Since 8 years have passed, she must act urgently before the deadline expires. She should immediately instruct a huissier (bailiff) to record the encroachment and consult an avocat to file a claim without delay.

2

First-time buyer discovers neighbour's unauthorised extension

Mark bought a flat in Marseille last month. During renovation, he found that the neighbour's storage shed, built in 2008, encroaches on the common hallway. The syndic says a secondary association was set up in 2020, so they might have a fresh claim. Mark is unsure if he can pursue removal.

Application pratique:

The 1983 decision clarifies that the prescription period starts from the date the shed was built (2008), so the 10-year deadline for a removal action has likely already passed. Mark should check if any interruption of prescription occurred (e.g., formal notice). He should gather old documents, such as co-ownership meeting minutes, to evidence attempts to challenge the encroachment. If prescription has indeed run, he may need to negotiate compensation instead.

3

Co-owner fights to remove decade-old fire escape

In a Toulouse co-ownership, a ground-floor owner installed a fire escape staircase on common ground in 2014 without consent. The co-owners only set up a secondary syndicate in 2023 to manage their building. Some believe the 10-year clock reset with the new syndicate, but others want immediate action.

Application pratique:

According to the Cassation ruling, the right to bring an action to remove the staircase existed for the co-owners as early as 2014, so the 10-year limitation period ends in 2024. The co-owners must file a legal claim before that deadline, irrespective of the secondary syndicate's formation date. They should swiftly convene a general meeting, vote to authorise legal action, and instruct an avocat to issue a mise en demeure (formal notice) to interrupt prescription if not already done.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide