Droit Immobilier

Except where it accompanies a

📅 Décision du 14 September 2006⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Except where it accompanies a decision that is already enforceable, the penalty payment takes effect on a date which cannot be earlier than the day on which the decision imposing the obligation was notified. Therefore, the Court of Appeal breaches Article 51 of Decree No. 92-755 of 31 December 1992, together with Article 503 of the New Code of Civil Procedure, when it gives effect to a penalty payment ordered by a case management judge from the date of the order, even though that order provided that the penalty payment would run from its date.

Reference decision: cc • No. 05-15.370 • 2006-09-14 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Except where it accompanies a decision that is already enforceable, the penalty payment takes effect on a date which cannot be earlier than the day on which the decision imposing the obligation was notified. Therefore, the Court of Appeal breaches Article 51 of Decree No. 92-755 of 31 December 1992, together with Article 503 of the New Code of Civil Procedure, when it gives effect to a penalty payment ordered by a case management judge from the date of the order, even though that order provided that the penalty payment would run from its date.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 05-15.370
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 14 septembre 2006

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide