It is the duty of the notary receiving the authentic deed of sale
Droit Immobilier

It is the duty of the notary receiving the authentic deed of sale

📅 Décision du 21 May 1990⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

It is the duty of the notary receiving the authentic deed of sale of a property to inform the buyer of that property that, under tax law, payment of VAT is the responsibility of the seller, unless the parties expressly agree on the final incidence of the tax. It follows that the judgment is liable to be quashed which, in order to dismiss the buyer of a property from their liability action against a notary on the ground of a breach by the latter of such duty to advise, holds that the preliminary sale agreement for that property contained a clause which could be interpreted as meaning, as is customary in property sales, that the seller intended to obtain a net price free of all charges, the existence of such custom being supported by the provisions of Article 1593 of the Civil Code according to which 'the costs of the deed and other ancillary expenses of the sale are borne by the buyer', whereas the express agreement of the parties on the final incidence of the tax did not arise from the terms of the preliminary sale agreement and Article 1593 of the Civil Code could not apply, VAT being an element that burdens the price agreed with the client and not an accessory to the price.

Reference decision: cc • No. 87-11.806 • 1990-05-21 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

It is the duty of the notary receiving the authentic deed of sale of a property to inform the buyer of that property that, under tax law, payment of VAT is the responsibility of the seller, unless the parties expressly agree on the final incidence of the tax. It follows that the judgment is liable to be quashed which, in order to dismiss the buyer of a property from their liability action against a notary on the ground of a breach by the latter of such duty to advise, holds that the preliminary sale agreement for that property contained a clause which could be interpreted as meaning, as is customary in property sales, that the seller intended to obtain a net price free of all charges, the existence of such custom being supported by the provisions of Article 1593 of the Civil Code according to which 'the costs of the deed and other ancillary expenses of the sale are borne by the buyer', whereas the express agreement of the parties on the final incidence of the tax did not arise from the terms of the preliminary sale agreement and Article 1593 of the Civil Code could not apply, VAT being an element that burdens the price agreed with the client and not an accessory to the price.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly adhere to the statutory time limits for bringing a claim
  • Keep all supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: a 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 87-11.806
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 21 mai 1990

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

First-time buyer surprised by VAT on new Bordeaux flat

Sophie, a first-time buyer, signed a promesse de vente for a new-build apartment in Bordeaux at €320,000. The contract stated the seller intended to receive a net price free of all charges, but made no mention of VAT. Her notary never explained that this ambiguous clause might leave her liable for the 20% VAT (€64,000).

Application pratique:

Under this case law, the notary had a duty to advise Sophie that VAT is the seller's responsibility unless the contract explicitly shifts it to the buyer. The phrase 'net price free of charges' is insufficient to transfer VAT liability. Sophie should immediately request her notary to clarify the VAT position in writing and, if the seller demands additional VAT, seek legal advice on claiming against the notary for the unexpected cost.

2

Investor misled by 'net price' clause in Lyon shop purchase

Marc, a property investor, bought a commercial shop in Lyon for €500,000 under a deed stating the seller would receive a 'net price free of all charges'. His notary invoked Article 1593 of the Civil Code, telling him that all ancillary costs, including VAT, were therefore his responsibility. Marc later discovered he had to pay €100,000 VAT on top.

Application pratique:

The decision clarifies that Article 1593 applies only to ancillary expenses like notary fees, not to VAT, which is part of the purchase price itself. Because Marc's contract lacked an express clause making him responsible for VAT, the seller should bear it. Marc can rely on this precedent to demand reimbursement of the VAT from the seller, and if the notary failed to inform him of this risk, he may also claim damages for professional negligence.

3

Retirees face unexpected VAT bill for Nice holiday home

Jean and Marie, a retired couple, purchased a new-build villa in Nice for €400,000. The deed simply stated the price was payable without specifying VAT treatment. Their notary did not explain that, for new builds, VAT is normally included unless explicitly excluded. Two years later, the tax authorities demanded €80,000 in unpaid VAT from them.

Application pratique:

This case law reinforces that a notary must advise buyers that VAT is the seller's liability absent an express agreement to the contrary. Since the deed contained no such clause, Jean and Marie should argue the seller is responsible. They should request their notary's file to check for any advisory note and, if none exists, consider a liability claim against the notary for the VAT amount, as the failure to advise caused their loss. Prompt action is essential due to limitation periods.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45