Droit Immobilier

It is a principle that the judge

📅 Décision du 30 January 2001⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

It is a principle that the investigating judge who has received a complaint lodged with an application to be joined as a civil party, in accordance with the provisions of Article 85 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is required to investigate, as if seised by an opening indictment from the public prosecutor. Furthermore, under paragraph 4 of Article 86 of the same Code, the public prosecutor may only seise the investigating judge with submissions that no investigation be opened if, for reasons affecting the public prosecution itself, the facts cannot legally give rise to a prosecution, or if, even if the facts were proved, they could not be given any criminal classification. Therefore, the decision of the indictment chamber which, by an abstract examination of the charge referred to in the complaint, refuses to investigate on the grounds that the facts would constitute a minor offence (contravention) and were not committed within its territorial jurisdiction, must be quashed. (1).

Reference decision: cc • No. 00-80.656 • 2001-01-30 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important clarification regarding your real estate law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

It is a principle that the investigating judge who has received a complaint lodged with an application to be joined as a civil party, in accordance with the provisions of Article 85 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is required to investigate, as if seised by an opening indictment from the public prosecutor. Furthermore, under paragraph 4 of Article 86 of the same Code, the public prosecutor may only seise the investigating judge with submissions that no investigation be opened if, for reasons affecting the public prosecution itself, the facts cannot legally give rise to a prosecution, or if, even if the facts were proved, they could not be given any criminal classification. Therefore, the decision of the indictment chamber which, by an abstract examination of the charge referred to in the complaint, refuses to investigate on the grounds that the facts would constitute a minor offence (contravention) and were not committed within its territorial jurisdiction, must be quashed. (1).

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, documents, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 00-80.656
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 30 janvier 2001

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide