Droit Immobilier

The clause which makes the acquisition conditional

📅 Décision du 22 November 2018⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

A clause which makes entitlement to the warranty conditional upon the carrying out of a technical study does not constitute an exclusion of warranty. The Court of Appeal, which, after having found that the construction of a retaining wall had been planned and entrusted by the client to a contractor under a contract separate from the individual house construction contract, orders the individual house builder to repair the damage resulting from the building of that wall, fails to draw the legal consequences of its own findings.

Reference decision: cc • No. 17-22.112 • 2018-11-22 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A clause which makes entitlement to the warranty conditional upon the carrying out of a technical study does not constitute an exclusion of warranty. The Court of Appeal, which, after having found that the construction of a retaining wall had been planned and entrusted by the client to a contractor under a contract separate from the individual house construction contract, orders the individual house builder to repair the damage resulting from the building of that wall, fails to draw the legal consequences of its own findings.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing an action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 17-22.112
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 22 novembre 2018

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide