The failure to reproduce in the

Reference decision: cc • No. 13-23.552 • 2015-01-28 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is how it affects you.

The situation

The failure to reproduce in the notification of the general meeting decisions the text of Article 42, paragraph 2, of Law No. 65-557 of 10 July 1965, mentioning the two-month time limit for challenge, renders this notification irregular

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

Strictly observe the statutory time limits for challenges
Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
Plan ahead: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail | → Browse all our legal articles

Cas d'usage pratiques

Missing challenge deadline text in Lyon co-ownership

In a Lyon condominium, the syndic sent minutes of a general meeting approving a €50,000 façade renovation, but omitted the mandatory two-month challenge deadline from Article 42, paragraph 2 of the 1965 law. A co-owner wishes to oppose this costly decision.

Application pratique:

Because the notification failed to reproduce the statutory text, it is irregular and the two-month challenge period never began. The co-owner can still file a legal challenge before the Lyon judicial court. Gather all documents, retain a specialist lawyer, and act promptly to avoid the syndic ratifying the decision through a subsequent proper notification.

First-time buyer in Nice faces improper AGM notification

Having just purchased a flat in Nice, a first-time buyer receives a general meeting notice that levies a €10,000 charge per owner for a new lift—but the notice lacks the exact wording of the two-month contestation deadline required by law.

Application pratique:

The irregular notification means the buyer’s time to challenge has not lapsed, even if two months have passed since receipt. They should immediately send a registered letter to the syndic disputing the decision and seek a emergency court order if necessary. Legal advice secured early can prevent financial loss, as a valid challenge forces a new vote.

Parisian landlord contests building insurance change after deadline

A landlord in Paris receives a general meeting decision notice switching the building’s insurer, which will raise service charges by 20% and complicate tenant relations. The notice omitted the Article 42, paragraph 2 two-month challenge period, and the landlord only realised the omission after three months.

Application pratique:

As the notification is irregular, the landlord retains the right to challenge despite the usual deadline having passed. They should file a legal action before the Paris judicial court without delay, using the notification defect as grounds. Simultaneously, they should inform tenants that the charge increase is contested to maintain trust.

The failure to reproduce in the

The situation

What the law says

Key points to remember

Informations juridiques

Source

Mots-clés

Cas d'usage pratiques

Missing challenge deadline text in Lyon co-ownership

First-time buyer in Nice faces improper AGM notification

Parisian landlord contests building insurance change after deadline

À propos de l'auteur

Consultez un avocat spécialisé près de chez vous

🎯 Sur le même sujet

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Annulation d'un compromis de vente à Juan-les-Pins : les recours

Garantie décennale construction Capbreton : vos recours avec un avocat

Dépôt de garantie non restitué à Fréjus : vos recours avec un avocat

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law