Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Appeal of a judgment ordering an investigative measure

📅 Décision du 26 January 1994⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

An appeal against a judgment ordering an investigative measure without deciding any part of the main claim, lodged at the same time as the appeal against the judgment on the merits, is only admissible if that appeal is itself admissible. Therefore, a court of appeal cannot infer from the indeterminate nature of the claim on which the interlocutory judgment ruled the admissibility of the appeal against that judgment together with the judgment on the merits when, the claims having been amended, the sums claimed are below the jurisdictional threshold.

Reference decision : cc • N° 92-15.328 • 1994-01-26 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

An appeal against a judgment ordering an investigative measure without deciding any part of the main claim, lodged at the same time as the appeal against the judgment on the merits, is only admissible if that appeal is itself admissible. Therefore, a court of appeal cannot infer from the indeterminate nature of the claim on which the interlocutory judgment ruled the admissibility of the appeal against that judgment together with the judgment on the merits when, the claims having been amended, the sums claimed are below the jurisdictional threshold.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 92-15.328
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 26 janvier 1994

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide