Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

The derogatory regime provided for by

📅 Décision du 18 February 1986⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The derogatory regime provided for by Article 710 of the General Tax Code, independent of that provided for by Article 1115 of the same Code in favour of property dealers, is not applicable as of right; therefore, a court correctly holds that a property dealer who, upon acquisition of a building, did not enter into the undertaking not to use it for any purpose other than residential use for three years, cannot benefit from the regime provided for by Article 710; the doctrine formally accepted by the tax authorities, when invoked by the taxpayer, must be interpreted as authorising the declaration of the undertaking by a separate instrument within the limits provided for by the administrative instructions in question, that is to say, within the time limit for lodging a claim running from the acquisition instrument. It follows that a court rightly dismisses a taxpayer's claim to benefit from the regime provided for by Article 710 of the General Tax Code, after having found that the undertaking provided for by that text, which had not been entered into at the time of acquisition, had been entered into after the expiry of the period during which the omission could be remedied.

Reference decision: cc • No. 84-14.412 • 1986-02-18 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The derogatory regime provided for by Article 710 of the General Tax Code, independent of that provided for by Article 1115 of the same Code in favour of property dealers, is not applicable as of right; therefore, a court correctly holds that a property dealer who, upon acquisition of a building, did not enter into the undertaking not to use it for any purpose other than residential use for three years, cannot benefit from the regime provided for by Article 710; the doctrine formally accepted by the tax authorities, when invoked by the taxpayer, must be interpreted as authorising the declaration of the undertaking by a separate instrument within the limits provided for by the administrative instructions in question, that is to say, within the time limit for lodging a claim running from the acquisition instrument. It follows that a court rightly dismisses a taxpayer's claim to benefit from the regime provided for by Article 710 of the General Tax Code, after having found that the undertaking provided for by that text, which had not been entered into at the time of acquisition, had been entered into after the expiry of the period during which the omission could be remedied.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, letters)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 84-14.412
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 18 février 1986

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide