Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

The trial judges who, following

📅 Décision du 05 March 1980⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The trial judges who, following damage caused in the cellar of an agricultural group, rule on the claim for compensation that it brought against the municipality and the French State, which was called in guarantee, may, analysing the factual circumstances, rely on serious, precise and concordant presumptions to find that the damage had not been the work of isolated individuals but that of a group acting in the context of winegrowing demonstrations and were therefore the work of a crowd or gathering within the meaning of Article 116 of the Code of Communal Administration.

Reference decision: cc • No. 78-14.096 • 1980-03-05 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The trial judges who, following damage caused in the cellar of an agricultural group, rule on the claim for compensation that it brought against the municipality and the French State, which was called in guarantee, may, analysing the factual circumstances, rely on serious, precise and concordant presumptions to find that the damage had not been the work of isolated individuals but that of a group acting in the context of winegrowing demonstrations and were therefore the work of a crowd or gathering within the meaning of Article 116 of the Code of Communal Administration.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory appeal deadlines
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 78-14.096
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 05 mars 1980

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide