Droit Immobilier

The agenda of a general meeting

📅 Décision du 22 June 2017⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

The agenda of a general meeting convened at the request of co-owners representing at least one quarter of the votes of all co-owners is not limited solely to the questions whose inclusion was requested by those co-owners. A Court of Appeal correctly deduces that a managing agent was able to supplement the agenda of such a meeting.

Reference decision: cc • No. 16-22.073 • 2017-06-22 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

The agenda of a general meeting convened at the request of co-owners representing at least one quarter of the votes of all co-owners is not limited solely to the questions whose inclusion was requested by those co-owners. A Court of Appeal correctly deduces that a managing agent was able to supplement the agenda of such a meeting.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly adhere to statutory appeal deadlines.
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence).
  • Anticipate: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 16-22.073
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 22 juin 2017

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Co-owner requests emergency meeting on roof repairs

A co-owner in a 12-unit building in Lyon, holding 30% of votes, demands a general meeting to address urgent roof leaks. The managing agent adds a vote on a €15,000 façade renovation and elevator modernisation to the agenda. The co-owner objects, believing only his items should be discussed.

Application pratique:

Under this case law, the agenda is not limited to the requesting co-owner's items. The managing agent can lawfully add supplementary matters. To challenge this, the co-owner would need to prove an abuse of process or irregularity in the convening notice, but the mere addition of items is permitted. He should review all documents, attend the meeting, and vote, while seeking legal advice if he suspects the additions are intended to dilute his original request. Any challenge must be brought within two months of the meeting.

2

Managing agent combines agenda items to save costs

As the managing agent of a 20-unit co-ownership in Nice, you receive a valid request from owners holding 28% of votes to hold a general meeting solely to replace the caretaker. You urgently need approval for €8,000 in fire safety upgrades and balcony repairs. To avoid calling two meetings within a month, you add these items to the agenda.

Application pratique:

The Cour de cassation confirms you may supplement the agenda beyond the requester's items. This allows you to address multiple pressing issues in one session, saving time and assembly costs. Ensure the supplementary items are clearly described in the convening notice sent at least 21 days before the meeting, and attach all supporting documents. This practice respects the law and improves building management efficiency, but be transparent to avoid disputes.

3

First-time buyer signs petition, gets surprise agenda

You recently bought a flat in Bordeaux in a 15-unit building. Co-owners circulate a petition to force a general meeting on installing bike racks (estimated €2,500). You sign, and the group reaches 26% of votes. Later, you are shocked to see the official agenda also includes a €20,000 courtyard landscaping project and appointment of a new managing agent.

Application pratique:

Under this decision, the agenda is not limited to items requested in the petition. The managing agent can lawfully add further matters. As a new co-owner, you must now carefully review all agenda items, attend the meeting or give a proxy, and vote on each resolution. If you feel the added items were unnecessary or not properly documented, you can consult a lawyer, but the supplementing of the agenda itself is legally valid. Use this as a lesson to stay informed about co-ownership governance and always read the full convening notice.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45