Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

When a collective agreement having the

📅 Décision du 09 July 1996⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

When a collective agreement having the same subject matter as a company practice is concluded between the employer and one or more representative trade union organisations in the company, that agreement has the effect of terminating that practice (decisions nos. 1 and 2). It is therefore of little importance that this practice was not subject to formal denunciation and notification to the employees (decision no. 1). The National collective agreement for caretakers, concierges and building employees and the departmental rider of 18 November 1981 containing no provision relating to the reimbursement by the landlord of the council tax, it follows that this collective agreement did not call into question the previous practice in the Rhône, which provided that the council tax was paid in full by the employer (decision no. 2).

Reference decision: cc • No. 93-40.865 • 1996-07-09 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

When a collective agreement having the same subject matter as a company practice is concluded between the employer and one or more representative trade union organisations in the company, that agreement has the effect of terminating that practice (decisions nos. 1 and 2). It is therefore of little importance that this practice was not subject to formal denunciation and notification to the employees (decision no. 1). The National collective agreement for caretakers, concierges and building employees and the departmental rider of 18 November 1981 containing no provision relating to the reimbursement by the landlord of the council tax, it follows that this collective agreement did not call into question the previous practice in the Rhône, which provided that the council tax was paid in full by the employer (decision no. 2).

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key takeaways

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, letters)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 93-40.865
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 09 juillet 1996

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide