Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Does not infringe the principle of

📅 Décision du 22 November 1984⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

Does not infringe the principle of the separation of powers the judgment which, in order to refuse, on a claim for compensation for disturbances exceeding the normal inconveniences of neighbourhood caused by a carpentry business, to order the modification of the operation to make it comply with administrative requirements, and to confine itself to awarding damages to the claimant, observes that the latter had built his dwelling house in an industrial zone where the carpentry business was also located, that he could only complain of abnormal disturbances in view of the classification of that zone, that the classification of a business fell exclusively within the remit of the administrative authority, and states that the judicial authority could neither hold that the establishment did not meet the conditions for being classified as it was, nor order the operator to modify its industrial installation until a new classification carried out by administrative means had occurred.

Reference decision: cc • N° 82-15.602 • 1984-11-22 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Does not infringe the principle of the separation of powers the judgment which, in order to refuse, on a claim for compensation for disturbances exceeding the normal inconveniences of neighbourhood caused by a carpentry business, to order the modification of the operation to make it comply with administrative requirements, and to confine itself to awarding damages to the claimant, observes that the latter had built his dwelling house in an industrial zone where the carpentry business was also located, that he could only complain of abnormal disturbances in view of the classification of that zone, that the classification of a business fell exclusively within the remit of the administrative authority, and states that the judicial authority could neither hold that the establishment did not meet the conditions for being classified as it was, nor order the operator to modify its industrial installation until a new classification carried out by administrative means had occurred.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly observe the statutory time limits for bringing an appeal.
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence).
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation.

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 82-15.602
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 22 novembre 1984

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide