Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Does not reverse the burden of proof

📅 Décision du 20 January 1976⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 1 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Does not reverse the burden of proof on the possession of the plaintiffs who claimed to have been deprived of part of their land following the construction of a new fence by the neighbouring owner, the Court of Appeal which declares admissible the action for recovery of possession brought by them, holding it established that at the date of installation of the said fence the plaintiffs had constantly had peaceful and public possession of the disputed strip of land and had conducted themselves as the sole and lawful owners thereof.

Reference decision: cc • N° 74-13.290 • 1976-01-20 • Consult the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Does not reverse the burden of proof on the possession of the plaintiffs who claimed to have been deprived of part of their land following the construction of a new fence by the neighbouring owner, the Court of Appeal which declares admissible the action for recovery of possession brought by them, holding it established that at the date of installation of the said fence the plaintiffs had constantly had peaceful and public possession of the disputed strip of land and had conducted themselves as the sole and lawful owners thereof.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice is always less costly than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 74-13.290
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 20 janvier 1976

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide