Undermines the authority of the

Application pratique:

The landlord should rely on res judicata: the first judgment's operative part dismissed all other claims, so the tenant cannot use rectification to change the amount. Rectification only corrects clerical errors, not substantive decisions. The landlord should oppose any such application with reference to this case law and keep the final judgment safe. If the tenant wants to challenge the amount, they must appeal within the statutory time limit, not seek rectification later.

Application pratique:

The buyer must understand that the initial judgment is final; they cannot use rectification to revisit the amount. If they disagreed with the award, they should have appealed within the one-month time limit. Now they must accept the €8,000. For any new damage arising after the judgment, they could file a new claim, but that would be a separate action, not a rectification. Keep all invoices and evidence of increased costs as they may support a new claim for additional loss.

Application pratique:

The co-owner should know that the judgment is final because the operative part dismissed all other claims. If they thought the counterclaim was overlooked, they should have raised it during the original proceedings or appealed. After the time limit, they cannot use rectification to alter the substantive outcome. They must pay the €3,000. For future disputes, document all communication with the syndicat and act quickly if a judgment seems incomplete.