Aller au contenu principal
Droit Immobilier

Prohibited by the public policy provision

📅 Décision du 10 June 1970⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 3 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Prohibited by the public policy provision of Article 832 of the Rural Code, subleases, even partial ones, constitute in themselves a ground for termination of the principal contract. If, under Article 835 of the same Code and by way of derogation from Article 832, the tenant may, during the term of the lease, carry out exchanges or leases of plots which have the effect of ensuring better farming, this is on condition that they have been made with the prior consent of the lessor or, failing that, with the authorisation of the Agricultural Land Tribunal.

Reference decision: cc • No. 68-12.121 • 1970-06-10 • View the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Prohibited by the public policy provision of Article 832 of the Rural Code, subleases, even partial ones, constitute in themselves a ground for termination of the principal contract. If, under Article 835 of the same Code and by way of derogation from Article 832, the tenant may, during the term of the lease, carry out exchanges or leases of plots which have the effect of ensuring better farming, this is on condition that they have been made with the prior consent of the lessor or, failing that, with the authorisation of the Agricultural Land Tribunal.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Scrupulously comply with the legal time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30 min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 68-12.121
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 10 juin 1970

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

Articles similaires en Immobilier

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit immobilier

Tous les articles Immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide